SeaRubi
Explorer
Now you are taking it too far
Please avoid making that a tattoo on your forearm. . .
Oh, I'd never go that far! But I'm not ruling out a Harris tweed headliner, Macassar ebony veneers, and elephant hide seats.
Now you are taking it too far
Please avoid making that a tattoo on your forearm. . .
Perhaps I should be more blatant and add [sarcasm] every time I post about cupholders. As for the d1 vs d2 argument, if I didn't have a 4runner project coming up in the next few months, I'd have my eyes on an RRC. Not to clutter the thread but if someone was in the market for a d1, I would personally choose an RRC over a D1.
-Sam
Yes. RRC's are great and there are advantages to the RRC over the Discos, such as the extra rear interior space of the D2, with a better departure angle due to the way the RRC is angled up at the rear. Better center of gravity. Smoother ride and better articulation in stock trim. Iconic styling. (Isn't this one of the only vehicles to get into the Louvre?)
Downsides are increasingly rare in decent condition = greater cost to buy. Some parts less available than the Discos, such as body items.
Now that's emotion . . . (embedded Camel Trophy video +1)
:26_13_1::26_13_1:
Well, I didn't mention it because the thread was straying off course as it is...but I have been searching for them as well. Problem is, that opens up a whole new set of questions for me. (desirable years, etc etc) Anything else about RRC's I should know? I'm not hating what I'm hearing. I had always thought (or more like assumed I guess) that they would cost more for upkeep. And obviously they always appeared to cater more to the "luxury" crowd. But of course I am slowly learning that many of my misconceptions are unfounded.
Im in the middle of getting my hands on a grey market 1983 RRC 4 door to serve as my second car, behind the D1. The RRC will eventually become the camping truck and the D1 will shed its body, grow a Defender HCPU cab and sprout a stake body/ tray rear and serve as the rough and tumble truck.
If youre looking at an RRC, youre looking at almost the same electronics as a D1 and the same overall wheelbase so manueverability is pretty damn awesome. Theres more space in length but not in stacking height, which is where the D1 is better. Big deal on the RRC: heater core...
I just got off the phone with Sean at Blue Ridge Rover Works. I was calling just to get some info on the D2 with all those hideous modifications P). Anyway, long story short he's working on a 93 RRC LWB that will most likely be up for sale soon. White on white and he said virtually rust free and very good shape as far as RRCs go. I'm gonna take a look at it when I go up next weekend along with the D2.
In the mean time I'm gonna test drive as many as I can in the area to get a feel for them.
Good. Drive as many as you can. Ive never been a fan of the LWB. 8" in the rear seat only makes no sense to me and as Ill never be in the rear seat to enjoy the limo-esque room, I dont see the point. Add to that the fact that the rear seats dont fold forward enough to take advantage of that extra 8" of room, you get no real value out of it. He used to have a Hunter edition SWB. If he still does, get your hands on that one. I was asking him about it but never got any word back on it from him. Ill stick with the two or three grey markets Ive found for sale and try to get my hands on those instead. I want a 5 speed RRC so badly.
Ive got a tattoo but I wouldnt get an LR tattoo. Car related tattoos are completely stupid. Example:
I believe that Land Rovers are best used as close to stock as possible. I learned the hard way that the more they are changed the more depressed they become. They await you as a faithful servant and a willing companion, and in return they ask for your patience, your respect, and your commitment.
Land Rovers tend to self-censor their potential ownership base.
Ok, I'm pretty emotional about vehicles too but... it is... just a hunk of steel, plastic, rubber and glass.
Your truck has a name, doesn't it?
Man, you Land Rover guys are brutal!